That decision has had a huge economic impact on small border towns in Texas, in particular the city of Presidio. It sits across from Ojinaga, Chihuahua, Mexico. The international port of entry here had been the largest for cattle imports from Mexico into the United States for eight decades.
Until last year, the USDA routinely sent inspectors across the border to a state-of-the-art building on the other side of the Rio Grande in Ojinaga.
About 2,500 head were checked every weekday and sent on to U.S. customers. But politicians from Texas and other states raised concerns over border violence.
Even the Texas Agriculture Commission entered the fray. An agency website claims Texas is “ground zero” for Mexican cartels, portraying the 1,200-mile border that Texas shares with Mexico as a war zone.
Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples says the USDA ban, one that federal officals said in October will continue indefinitely, is justified.
“Until the Mexican government can control the violence and guarantee the safety of our federal employees,” he said, “I have to agree that we should not send them in harm’s way the across the border.”
But the ban has had real economic consequences here. Cattle broker Salvador Baeza at the Presidio stockyard says the economic fallout in Presidio totals $5 million and counting.
“PresidIo’s losing a lot of money that’s supposed to stay in town. The stores are losing money,” Baeza said. “Everybody’s losing money.”
Here’s why. The inspection pen on the Texas side of the Rio Grande is a makeshift affair that can’t handle more than 700 head per week, a far cry from the 2,500 every day before the USDA decision. So Mexican producers — among the largest exporters of cattle to the United States, accounting for 25 percent of all beef imports from Mexico — are now trucking their cattle to a USDA inspection site across the border in New Mexico, a rough journey of four hours.
Alberto Attolini of the Chihuahua Cattle Producers Association in Ojinaga said the Presidio/Ojinaga crossing had worked well for 90 years before the USDA pullout.
“The persons not just from Chihuahua but from 11 other states from Mexico come
through here,” Attolini said.
Attolini says the makeshift Texas inspection site is too small to make it the trip worthwhile. He doesn’t understand the security concerns. Ojinaga, he says, is relatively tranquil and the statistics — five murders so far this year — support that claim.
Moreover the four hour journey to Santa Teresa, N.M., stresses the animals to the point they lose weight and therefore value on the trip.
“They lose a lot of weight,” Attolini said. “They say around 5 to 7 percent. And that’s the reason why we’ve lost a lot of money to be inspected here in the United States.”
The USDA has told Fronteras Desk that the agency hopes eventually to return to Ojinaga and other shuttered Mexicans stations. But it stands by its decision, citing unspecified threats.
But meanwhile the inspection ban will likely have economic consequences that stretch far beyond this remote border region.
Jim Dunn is an economist at Penn State University’s College of Agricultural Sciences. He said if you like fast food, you may be have to pay more for your hamburger should the ban continue.
“We buy a lot of cattle from other countries. And Mexico has historically been the most important source for those international cattle,” Dunn said. “A lot of that cattle comes into the United States and becomes hamburger. So it’s a big balance of our livestock industry. We sell them high quality meat for steaks for the fancy resorts and we buy a lot of hamburger from them.”
Cattle producers say that traditional arrangement has been crippled by the inspection ban. Cattle producers from both countries are meeting to craft their own security plan they hope will convince Washington that cross border inspections are safe.
